Employer guide
Better alternatives to a gym stipend for employee wellness
The short answer
Better alternatives pay for specific actions or reach people with health risks, instead of funding memberships that active staff already use. Options with evidence include per-visit incentives paired with a commitment option, team step challenges built on competition, and screening followed by structured coaching for people at risk. Under IRS rules a cash gym stipend is generally taxable pay; only an on-premises gym the employer runs has its own exclusion.
Why gym stipends tend to reach people who already exercise
In the Illinois Workplace Wellness Study, employees who signed up for the wellness program had visited the campus gym more often before it began, and were more likely to have entered local running events, than those who did not. In its first year the program then had no effect on gym visits. Wellness offers tend to be taken up by the people who are already active.
A field experiment with 1,000 employees of a Fortune 500 company shows what that costs. Employees were paid $10 per visit, for up to three visits a week over four weeks, to use the company gym. Before the study, only about 60% of existing gym members used it at least once in an average week. The researchers estimated that about 35% of the incentive money paid for new exercise, while 65% paid employees for exercise they would have done anyway.
Paying for a membership is not the same as paying for exercise. A study of 7,752 members of three US health clubs found that people on monthly contracts costing over $70 went an average of 4.3 times a month. That is more than $17 a visit, when a 10-visit pass cost $10 a visit. On average they gave up about $600 in savings over their membership.
How a gym stipend is taxed
IRS Publication 15-B (2026) sets out the rules for fringe benefits. Any fringe benefit an employer provides is taxable and must be included in the recipient's pay unless the law specifically excludes it. A taxable benefit given to an employee is generally subject to employment taxes and reported on Form W-2.
The exclusion for gyms is narrow. An employer can exclude the value of an employee's use of an on-premises gym or other athletic facility that it operates, on premises it owns or leases, if substantially all use during the year is by employees, their spouses and their dependent children. It does not apply if the facility is open to the general public through the sale of memberships. A cash stipend, or a membership at a public gym, does not fit that exclusion.
Cash cannot be treated as a small, tax-free extra either. Publication 15-B says cash and cash equivalents, such as gift cards, are never excludable as a de minimis benefit, however small. That applies to wellness prizes too: a gift card for winning a challenge is taxable. This is general information, not tax advice, so check your own plans with your tax adviser.
Alternative 1: pay for visits, then offer a commitment option
If you want to keep a gym benefit, pay for use rather than membership. In the Fortune 500 experiment, the $10 per-visit incentive raised gym use strongly while it ran, but long-run effects were modest at best. Half the incentive group was then offered a self-funded commitment contract: employees put their own money on a pledge to keep using the gym for the next two months, and it went to charity if they did not. That group showed lasting change, with the share using the gym still around 20% to 25% above the control group a full year after the program began.
The trade-offs: you need a way to verify visits, which is easiest with an on-site gym. Only 12% of those offered a commitment contract took one up. And most of the incentive money still goes to people who would have exercised anyway.
Alternative 2: team challenges built on competition
The STEP UP trial, published in JAMA Internal Medicine in 2019, enrolled 602 adults with overweight or obesity, recruited from Deloitte employees. Three groups entered a 24-week game with points and levels for hitting step goals. Compared with a control group that only had a wearable, daily steps rose by 920 in the competition arm, 689 in the support arm and 637 in the collaboration arm. Only the competition arm stayed significantly ahead in the 12 weeks after the game ended, by 569 steps a day.
The trade-offs: everyone needs a way to track activity, competition beat the support and collaboration designs, and activity fell in every arm once the game stopped. Plan challenges as a continuing part of the year, not a one-off. Cash or gift card prizes are taxable pay.
Alternative 3: screening with structured follow-up for people at risk
A stipend cannot tell you who is at risk. A blood panel can, and it opens the way to targeted follow-up, which is where the strongest evidence sits. In the Diabetes Prevention Program, adults with raised blood glucose who followed a structured lifestyle program, aiming for at least 7% weight loss and 150 minutes of activity a week, cut their rate of new diabetes by 58% compared with placebo. RAND found that disease management for employees with chronic conditions returned $3.80 per dollar in one large employer's program, against $0.50 for lifestyle management.
The trade-offs: screening on its own is not enough. In the BJ's Wholesale Club trial, screenings plus 8 modules delivered by registered dietitians did not change 10 clinical markers, including cholesterol and blood pressure, after 18 months, and employees completed an average of 1.3 modules. The follow-up has to be personal and sustained, which costs more per participant than a stipend. Health information also brings privacy duties that a gym benefit does not.
Alternative 4: an on-site gym or low-cost changes
Employers with space can run an on-site gym, the one gym benefit with its own tax exclusion. It still relies on people choosing to use it, so track use from the start. For smaller budgets, RAND notes that measures such as healthier food choices and campaigns to use the stairs cost little compared with screening every employee and offering one-to-one coaching.
Choosing between them
- To reach people at health risk: screening with structured, personal follow-up.
- To get more of the team moving: a competitive team challenge that keeps running through the year.
- To keep a gym benefit: pay per verified visit, add a commitment option, and consider an on-site facility for its tax treatment.
- On a tight budget: low-cost changes such as healthier food choices and stair campaigns. They are cheap, but the studies above do not measure their effect.
- Whatever you choose, decide what you will measure before you start, and check the tax treatment with your adviser.
How Wolfburgh does it
Wolfburgh's 90-day, physician-led staff health pilot is one alternative: an at-home blood panel of 17 markers reviewed by a licensed physician on Day 1 and at a Day 90 re-test, live 45-minute 1-on-1 video sessions with a nutritionist, a personal trainer and a behaviour specialist, and company challenges and department leaderboards with prizes the employer chooses. It sits outside the benefits plan, with no open enrolment and no broker. Details at https://www.wolfburgh.com/businesses
See how the 90-day employer pilot works, or the pricing.
Common questions
Is a gym membership reimbursement taxable to employees?
Generally yes. IRS Publication 15-B says any fringe benefit is taxable unless the law specifically excludes it. The gym exclusion covers only an on-premises athletic facility the employer operates, used substantially by employees and their families, and not one that sells memberships to the public. A stipend or reimbursement for a public gym does not fit, so it is usually included in pay. Check with your tax adviser.
Do employees actually use the gym memberships they pay for?
Often less than they expect. In a study of 7,752 members of three US health clubs, people paying over $70 a month went 4.3 times a month on average, more than $17 a visit, when a 10-visit pass cost $10 a visit. At one Fortune 500 company, only about 60% of existing members of the company gym used it at least once in an average week.
Are step challenges better than a gym stipend?
They have better evidence for changing behaviour. In the STEP UP trial, adults with overweight or obesity in a competitive 24-week step game walked 920 more steps a day than controls, and 569 more in the 12 weeks after it ended. Gym incentives, by contrast, mostly paid for exercise that would have happened anyway in one Fortune 500 study. Challenges need activity tracking, and their effect fades if they stop.
Are prizes for employee wellness challenges taxable?
Cash and cash equivalents, such as gift cards, are taxable however small: IRS Publication 15-B says they are never excludable as a de minimis benefit. A non-cash item can be de minimis if its value is so small, taking into account how often similar items are given, that accounting for it would be unreasonable or impracticable. Check prize plans with your tax adviser before launch.
Sources
- IRS. Publication 15-B (2026), Employer's Tax Guide to Fringe Benefits
- NBER. Jones, Molitor and Reif, What Do Workplace Wellness Programs Do? Evidence from the Illinois Workplace Wellness Study (Working Paper 24229; published in the Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2019)
- NBER. Royer, Stehr and Sydnor, Incentives, Commitments and Habit Formation in Exercise: Evidence from a Field Experiment with Workers at a Fortune-500 Company (Working Paper 18580; published in American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2015)
- American Economic Review. DellaVigna and Malmendier, Paying Not to Go to the Gym (2006)
- JAMA Internal Medicine. Patel et al., Effectiveness of Behaviorally Designed Gamification Interventions With Social Incentives for Increasing Physical Activity (STEP UP trial, 2019)
- New England Journal of Medicine. Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group, Reduction in the Incidence of Type 2 Diabetes with Lifestyle Intervention or Metformin (2002)
- RAND. Mattke et al., Do Workplace Wellness Programs Save Employers Money? (Research Brief RB-9744, 2014)
- JAMA. Song and Baicker, Effect of a Workplace Wellness Program on Employee Health and Economic Outcomes: A Randomized Clinical Trial (2019)
This page is general information, not medical, tax or legal advice, and it does not replace a consultation with your own doctor or plan administrator.
Running a team of 40 to 1,000? A 90-day, physician-led staff health pilot: at-home blood testing, live specialists, company challenges and one anonymised aggregate report.
See the employer pilot →